Department
Math
Degree Name
Master of Science (MS)
Abstract
The meteoric splendor of the transcendental constant e is an intriguing mystery. It rises unexpectedly from nowhere, brilliantly illuminates some obscure mathematical concept, points to its solution, and abruptly fades into oblivion. Its unheralded visitation leaves the student wiser but wondering, tantalized by its omnipotence in apparently unrelated fields. Ever since his first introduction to e in elementary logarithms it has seemed to the writer that all the authors of textbooks are in a conspiracy to defeat any real knowledge of e. They say "2.71828… , called e, is the base of Naperian logarithms." Why? "The derivative of eX is eX." Why? "Placing y - eX, the solution is evident." Why? To answer these interminable "why's" is the object of this thesis; to conquer this phantom in a field of logic. The laconic title, e, is perhaps too all-inclusive. It tends to connote an absolute knowledge of everything pertaining to e. The writer does not pretend to that knowledge. Rather he has attempted to gather from all available sources a little of everything concerning this constant. In this attempt he hopes to justify the title e.
Keywords
Euler's number, Mathematical constant, Napier's constant, Jacob Bernoulli, Euler's identity, Irrational numbers, Transcendental numbers
Advisor
Dr. Edward E. Colyer
Date of Award
Spring 1935
Document Type
Thesis
Recommended Citation
Brooks, Doyle K., "e" (1935). Master's Theses. 232.
DOI: 10.58809/OPGF8894
Available at:
https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses/232
Rights
© The Author(s)
Comments
For questions contact ScholarsRepository@fhsu.edu