Abstract
The Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) of the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE, 2026) shape not only curriculum and assessment, but also the intellectual formation and culture of the social work profession. As the accrediting framework for programs across the United States, the EPAS articulate the definition of competent practice and what constitutes a shared professional identity (Zuchowski, 2024). Yet accreditation standards necessarily do more than articulate competencies; they can also shape which perspectives are institutionally centered and normalized (Sue, 2010). Professional education operates not only through explicit curricular content, but through implicit norms governing what questions may be asked, which perspectives are considered legitimate, and how disagreement is handled (Lukianoff & Haidt, 2015). Because EPAS revisions occur only once every seven years, each iteration exerts long-term influence on the profession’s norms and priorities, shaping social work practice for years thereafter.
Document Type
Editorial
Source Publication
Research on Social Work Practice
Version
Published Version
Publication Date
4-13-2026
First Page
1
Last Page
7
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Rights
The Author(s) 2026
Recommended Citation
Twis, M. K., Hodge, D. R., Farber, N., Horner, P., Rueda, H. A., Lens, V., Drake, B., & Alam, N. Epistemic Pluralism, Open Inquiry, and Constructive Disagreement: Strengthening the 2029 EPAS. Research on Social Work Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315261441544
Comments
For questions contact [email protected]