Abstract
This study examined differences in hearing screening outcomes between manual audiometry and the iPhone Hearing Test using Apple AirPods Pro (2nd generation) among 30 adults. Participants completed pure-tone threshold screenings at frequencies ranging from 250 Hz to 8000 Hz in a sound-treated audiology suite. Manual audiometry followed a modified Hughson-Westlake procedure, while the automated test used Apple’s standardized protocol. After both screenings, participants reported perceptions of accuracy, convenience, and preference through a questionnaire. Results from the screenings and surveys provided insight into participant trust, perceived reliability, and the practicality of smartphone-based hearing tests compared to traditional methods. Findings highlight the potential for accessible, consumer-based hearing assessments while emphasizing the continued value of clinician-administered audiometry.
Faculty Advisor
Blake Roth
Department/Program
Communication Sciences and Disorders
Submission Type
in-person poster
Date
4-13-2026
Rights
Copyright the Author(s)
Recommended Citation
White, Kelsi; Sprague, McKayla; Sadler, Jennifer; and Roth, Blake
(2026)
"Manual Audiometry vs. iPhone Hearing Test: A Comparative Analysis of Hearing Screening Results,"
SACAD: Scholarly Activities: Vol. 2026, Article 82.
Available at:
https://scholars.fhsu.edu/sacad/vol2026/iss2026/82
