Abstract
Barry Gibbs was wrongfully convicted in the murder of Virginia Robertson in 1986 based primarily on forced testimony of a single witness. The witness had been tutored by NYPD detective Louis Eppolito, who possessed ties to organized crime. Gibbs was sentenced to life imprisonment but acquitted in 2005 based on forensic evaluation and evidence of corrupting witnesses. Forensic re-testimonies, in the form of inconsistencies in the witness’ statement and forensic evidence, were crucial for proving his innocence. Neither the judge nor the prosecutor questioned the testimony’s credibility, while the lawyer of the accused failed to forcefully object to the investigative methods. Had the lack of forensic evidence been questioned, Gibbs’ wrongful conviction would have been avoided. This case is a reminder of the importance of forensic integrity and the dangers of overdependence on coerced eyewitness testimony. It highlights the need for more intense examination of police practice and forensic corroboration to prevent such miscarriages of justice.
Faculty Advisor
Morgan Steele
Department/Program
Criminal Justice
Submission Type
in-person poster
Date
4-1-2025
Rights
Copyright the Author(s)
Recommended Citation
Rains, Gracie
(2025)
"Barry Gibbs' Wrongful Conviction and Exoneration,"
SACAD: Scholarly Activities: Vol. 2025, Article 56.
Available at:
https://scholars.fhsu.edu/sacad/vol2025/iss2025/56
