Critical Theory and the Limits of Academic Economics: Resolving the Political in Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Authors

Daniel Krier, Iowa State UniversityFollow
Kevin S. Amidon Ph.D.Follow

Abstract

This essay assesses the central arguments of Piketty?s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. We note Piketty?s limited engagement with and active distancing from the writings of Marx. Piketty?s location within the disciplinary boundaries of academic economics seems to have profoundly shaped his surprisingly apolitical analysis. Engagement with the political dimensions of capital is further constrained to increase the book?s influence upon policy. We analyze important limitations to Piketty?s work that result from these disciplinary constraints. Important politically implicated concepts, problems, and approaches that relate to Piketty?s substantial empirical work are: labor process studies, research on speculative capitalism, and literature highlighting institutional and political determinants among varieties of capitalism.

Document Type

Article

Source Publication

Critical Sociology

Version

Published Version

DOI

10.1177/0896920514565487

Publication Date

1-1-2015

Volume

41

Issue

2

First Page

349

Last Page

357

Rights

© The Author(s)

Comments

For questions contact ScholarsRepository@fhsu.edu

Recommended Citation

Krier, D., & Amidon, K. S. (2015). Critical Theory and the Limits of Academic Economics: Resolving the Political in Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Critical Sociology, 41(2), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920514565487