Abstract
This project employs a qualitative media analysis to compare two toxic leaders, Regina George from Mean Girls (2004) and President Snow from The Hunger Games series. Both characters exhibit manipulative leadership tactics to maintain control in different social contexts. Regina, the dominant queen bee of her high school, leads The Plastics through emotional manipulation and fear tactics. She employs a transactional leadership style, offering social rewards for compliance and punishing lack of agreement with exclusion. Her leadership is rooted in a need for validation, using her followers to reinforce her own status. In contrast, President Snow rules through violence and intimidation, enforcing a situational leadership approach to sustain his power. He adapts his tactics while concealing his true motives, ensuring the continuation of The Hunger Games to suppress rebellion. His leadership stems from a deep-seated desire for control and revenge, exploiting those under him to maintain his authority. Despite their different environments, both leaders manipulate emotions and identities for personal gain, fostering fear, distrust, and psychological harm. This project explores how their toxic leadership styles impact their followers and contribute to harmful power dynamics. Completed for PSY 350/LDRS 490: Psychology of Leadership.
Faculty Advisor
Dr. Nuchelle Chance
Department/Program
Psychology
Submission Type
in-person poster
Date
4-1-2025
Rights
Copyright the Author(s)
Recommended Citation
Schlyer, Madeline G. and Brown, Kerstin R.
(2025)
"Manipulation and Power: A Comparative Analysis of Toxic Leadership in Mean Girls and The Hunger Games,"
SACAD: Scholarly Activities: Vol. 2025, Article 44.
Available at:
https://scholars.fhsu.edu/sacad/vol2025/iss2025/44
Included in
Leadership Studies Commons, Psychology Commons, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Commons
