The purpose of the qualitative grounded theory study was to explore why industrial arts educators resisted organizational change to technology and engineering education. An exploratory, grounded theory method was used to identify new theory related to educators’ resistance because the current literature did not provide a theoretical perspective about why industrial arts educators have resisted the change. The sampling frame was derived from a database of 379 secondary technology and engineering education teachers in the state of Kansas, and a sample size of 13 participants was needed to reach theoretical saturation of the phenomenon. The data for the study was collected through observations and face-to-face semi-structured interviews with in-service industrial education teachers. Data collected from the observations and interviews were analyzed using the three phase classic grounded theory coding technique. Data analysis and interpretation resulted in the emergence of three substantive theories related to the study phenomenon: (a) inefficacious transition to technology and engineering education, (b) value for technical learning, and (c) industry demand-based change.
The Journal of Technology Studies
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Notice: This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code).
Rigler Jr., K. L. (2016). Educators’ Resistance to the Technology and Engineering Education Transition. Journal of Technology Studies, 42(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v42i1.a.4